The Expanding Universe

The galaxies aren't moving — the space between them is growing

This is the subtle point that makes the whole thing click. When we say a distant galaxy is "receding," it isn't really flying through space away from us like a thrown ball. Instead, new space is continually appearing between us and it. The galaxies sit more or less still; the distance between them swells. That's why the effect gets stronger with distance — the more space there is between you and a galaxy, the more of it is stretching, so the faster that galaxy pulls away. This is the observable signature of expansion, and we read it in the color of the light.

Diagram by Michael Paycer (schematic). Because the wave is stretched by the growth of space itself, not by the galaxy's motion through space, this is called cosmological redshift — and it's the direct fingerprint of an expanding universe.

Redshift: reading expansion in the rainbow

Every element absorbs and emits light at its own exact set of colors — a barcode of dark and bright lines in a star's spectrum. Astronomers know precisely where those lines should sit. In the light of distant galaxies, the entire barcode is shifted toward the red end of the spectrum, and by exactly the same fraction across the board. That's the smoking gun: the light hasn't changed which elements it came from, its whole wavelength has been stretched in transit. Measure the shift, and you measure how much the universe has expanded since the light left. This is redshift, and it is the workhorse of modern cosmology — the same effect that lets the CMB tell us the universe's age, and that reveals the faint red galaxies in the deepest images as the youngest and most distant of all.

In 1929 Edwin Hubble plotted galaxy distance against redshift and found a clean straight line: twice as far, twice as fast. That proportionality is Hubble's law, and its slope — the Hubble constant — is the expansion rate of the universe, one of the most important numbers in science. It tells us the universe is roughly 13.8 billion years old, and it's the reason we can say the cosmos had a beginning.

The Hubble tension — two right answers that disagree

Here is where cosmology gets refreshingly honest about its own limits. There are two excellent, independent ways to measure the expansion rate today, and they stubbornly disagree. One method reads it from the cosmic microwave background — the early universe — and predicts a rate of about 67 kilometers per second per megaparsec. The other measures it directly in the nearby universe, using pulsating stars and exploding stars as distance markers, and gets about 73. Both methods have been refined for years; both have shrunk their error bars to around one percent. And the gap between them hasn't closed — it has gotten harder to explain away.

This is called the Hubble tension, and as of the mid-2020s it is one of the sharpest open problems in physics. It's too large now to blame on a simple mistake, and its persistence suggests our standard model of the cosmos may be missing something — perhaps a subtle wrinkle in dark energy, or a new particle, or an incomplete picture of the early universe. Nobody knows yet. That's not a weakness of the science; it's the science working. The universe handed us two answers to the same question, and the honest response is to say so, and go looking for why.

The lawyer-astronomer and the priest

The expanding universe has two fathers, and history has been kinder to one than the other. Edwin Hubble — a former lawyer and amateur boxer turned astronomer — made the definitive measurements at Mount Wilson in 1929, using the giant 100-inch telescope to nail down galaxy distances and confirm the redshift-distance relation that now bears his name. But two years earlier, in 1927, the Belgian priest Georges Lemaître had already derived the expansion from theory and even estimated its rate — he just published in an obscure French journal that few read. For decades Hubble got nearly all the credit; only in 2018 did the International Astronomical Union vote to rename the relation the "Hubble–Lemaître law," a small, belated act of fairness.

What makes the discovery so profound is what it did to time. A static, eternal universe has no story. But an expanding one, wound backward, arrives at a beginning — a hot, dense origin, the Big Bang. Lemaître saw this immediately and, being both a physicist and a poet, described the whole history of the cosmos as the fading aftermath of a single primordial event.

Cosmology Hub · The Big Bang · CMB · Dark Energy · Observable Universe · Galaxies · Astronomy · Glossary